About UPLB Research, Development and Extension

The university has carved its solid reputation as a premier learning institution in the country and Asia. For years now, it has kept the lead in generating diverse breakthroughs in crop production, crop protection, plant and animal breeding, postharvest technologies, food processing, biotechnology, forestry, agricultural engineering and veterinary medicine.

This section seeks to ensure efficient conduct of research and judicious use of resources in the university and includes information, administrative procedures and guidelines for its research activities. This a reference for administrators, scientists, research staff, as well as for agencies and institutions whose funding make research in UPLB possible.

Information about UPLB Research and Extension

On November 20, 1972, through Presidential Decree No. 58, the UP System was created, with UPLB constituted as autonomous unit. Though instruction was considered as UPLB's major function, research was also recognized as an equally important function.
UPLB Gate
Moreover, extension was viewed as a function that ensured UPLB's relevance in the development of the countryside. "All efforts in acquiring knowledge through research, imparting it through instruction, and applying it through public service are directed towards the development of the whole man".

University Research, Extension and Development Thrusts

Criteria has been set forth in establishing research and extension priorities in the development, processing, and funding of research and extension proposals. UPLB consulted with its various units to identify research and extension thrusts. At the 10th University Research and Extension Council (UREC) General Assembly held on February 19, 1996, the following thrusts were approved to be pursued:

Research

  • Sustainable productivity and efficient resource use premised on ecological balance;
  • Optimal rural and urban development;
  • Appropriate technologies for processing industries;
  • Basic research and cutting-edge technologies; and
  • Indigenous knowledge systems and Philippine culture.

Extension

  • Develop or test extension policies, models and approaches towards wider application;
  • Respond to development issues, problems, changing needs and demands of its clientele;
  • Disseminate and apply results of research and other relevant information and social technologies towards addressing issues and problems from the environment; and
  • Contribute towards improving the quality of life of the people through improvement of agricultural production, better nutrition and health, and moral upliftment.
In 1999, UPLB's mandate was reassessed from its traditional role in providing national leadership in instruction, research and extension in agriculture, forestry and related fields to meeting the growing needs for quality education in the arts and sciences, humanities and engineering. The university's mandate was broadened to include far-reaching policy and institutional reforms to address the problems of industry and agriculture; national development framework premised on accelerated economic growth; the Arroyo administration's social contract with the poor; the Agriculture and Fisheries and Modernization Act (AFMA) premised on dynamic, smallholder agriculture; a need to revitalize education; call for more investment in productivity-enhancing research and development; and the pressing need to enhance institutional capability at all levels. Further, with its several centers of excellence, UPLB shares it institutional resources with the country's state colleges and universities (SUCs). With the broadened UPLB mandate, the strategic vision, plans of action and priority research areas were set as follows:
  • Molecular biology and biotechnology
  • Biodiversity and genetic resource management
  • Natural resource management
  • Information and communication technology
  • Knowledge systems and development and policy studies, and
  • Sustainable production systems
As part of his vision for UPLB Chancellor Luis Rey I. Velasco, UPLB oriented its programs to three priority areas – food and agriculture, environment, and biotechnology, where the university will focus and build its academic research programs around niches and themes that will respond to and anticipate major national needs:

Themes

  • Agricultural Modernization and Competitiveness
  • Equitable and Sustainable Rural Development
  • Managing Tropical Ecosystems
  • Urban-Rural Transition
  • Research and Manpower Support to CALABARZON
  • Continuing Education via Open and Distance Learning

Niches

  • Alternative Energy RDE
  • Natural Products RDE
  • Bio-oganics RDE

University RDE Administration and Organization

Before UPCA became UPLB, the university was already performing a trilogy of functions: teaching, research and extension. As the highest academic body in UPLB, the University Council formulates instruction policies. Until 1984, there was no parallel body for consultation and policy-making in research and extension.

The University Research and Extension Council (UREC)

The UREC was created through Executive Order No. 5 series of 1984 to provide direction for research at UPLB and to coordinate the university's research programs and activities. The UREC operates at the university level as a policy-making body and an adviser to the UPLB Chancellor. Specifically, the UREC:
  • Determines or recommends whenever appropriate, policies, standards, and rules relating to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of university and extension programs;
  • Periodically reviews university research and extension thrusts/ directions;
  • Reviews and recommends policies concerning research and extension personnel;
  • Serves as channel for communication among the different units of the university about major developments in research and extension;
  • Serves as a forum for discussion of issues; and
  • Advises the university administration on matters requiring decisions or action.

UREC Members

Automatic membership to the UREC is given to the following:
  • Personnel with academic designation of University Researcher I (SG 16) or higher and University Extension Specialist I or higher (equivalent to Instructor IV or higher); and
  • Faculty members with rank of at least Assistant Professor I serving as leaders of research and extension programs officially approved by UPLB.
By virtue of their administrative positions, the following are ex-officio members:
  • The UPLB Chancellor as ex-officio chair;
  • The Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension as UREC secretary;
  • The vice-chancellors for instruction, planning and development, administration, and community affairs;
  • Deans of academic units;
  • Heads of research and extension units; and
  • College/ unit research and/ or extension coordinators.

Standing and Ad-hoc Committees

The following are the different standing and ad-hoc committees of the UREC and their functions:
UREC Executive Committee
  • With the Chancellor as Chair, the committee is composed of all deans, vice-chancellors, chairs of standing committees, and seven (7) members elected at-large who shall serve a term of two (2) years without reelection.
  • It convenes to decide urgent matters for the council when it is impractical to wait for a meeting of the entire council. Such decisions shall be reported to the council at its next meeting.
  • It reviews the items previously acted upon by other UREC committees and determines the agenda of UREC meetings.
Committee on Research Direction and Utilization
  • Reviews policy proposals concerning identification of research thrusts and priorities; piloting and demonstration of university-developed technologies; publications; information systems; and training and other extension activities.
Committee on Research and Extension Administration
  • Reviews and recommends proposals for consideration of the council on matters pertaining to the institution and improvement of fiscal and business procedures; establishment, support, and maintenance of laboratories and other facilities; and the evaluation and monitoring of activities and other administrative matters.
Committee on Personnel Welfare
  • Reviews items addressed to the UREC, particularly on matters relating to personnel welfare and discipline such as compensation, workload, fringe benefits, working conditions, training and scholarships.
Other Committees
  • As it deems appropriate, the UREC, by majority vote, may form other standing committees. The UREC chair may form ad-hoc to study important issues not covered by any of the standing committees.

UPLB Research, Development and Extension Profile

Resources are essential in the conduct and success of research and extension undertakings. These include manpower, facilities, and financing. Linkages and partnerships with various public and private organizations are essential in the generation of support for research and extension.

Current Research Finances

The total research fund in 2006 was P 36.21 M. This was P 9.8 M or 119% lower than in 2005. This was due to the decrease in research fund generated from the government funding agencies and international organizations.
Total Research Funds Generated (2004-2006) in '000s.
[table=tables-colorful-list Year | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 Government funding agencies | 36,995 | 39,602 | 31,740 International funding agencies | 3,900 | 5,746 | 3,676 Local and private funding agencies | 263 | 651 | 792 TOTAL | 41,248 | 45,999 | 36,208 ] The total UPLB R and D budget covering the period of November 2005 to October 2006 was P 36,208,000 for 158 projects. UPLB got the highest research grant of P 31.7 M from government agencies for 145 projects. This was followed by grants coming from international agencies (P 36 M)for nine (9) projects and from local private organizations (P 792,000) for four (4) projects. Among the government agencies, DA-BAR provided the highest project support (P 11.946 M) followed by PCARRD/DOST (P 5.516 M) and PCARRD (P 3.252 M). Among the international organization, ACIAR gave the highest R and D fund grant of P 1.667 M followed by KUL-Belgium with P 1.097 M and IFS with P 447,000.
Number of projects implemented and research budget allocated by various funding agencies (FY 2006).
[table=tables-colorful-list Sources of Funds | Budget (P '000) | Number of Projects Government Agencies | | | Bureau of Postharvest Research and Extension | 702 | 1 | CHED-Zonal Research Center | 829 | 6 | Department of Agriculture | 1,128 | 3 | DA-Burea of Agricultural Research | 11,946 | 38 | DA-CDF-National Food Administration | 263 | 1 | Fiber Industry Development Agency | 700 | 3 | Philippine Council for Aquatic and Marine Resources Research and Development | 499 | 1 | Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources Research and Development | 3,252 | 9 | PCARRD-Department of Science and Technology | 5,516 | 16 | PCARRD-Southern Tagalog Agriculture and Resources Research and Development Consortium | 1,101 | 7 | Philippine Council for Advanced Science and Technology Research and Development | 1,756 | 6 | Philippine Council for Industrial and Energy Research and Development | 353 | 1 | Philippine Rice Research Institute | 1,780 | 24 | UPLB Trust Fund | 200 | 2 | UPLB Basic Research | 1,675 | 26 | Visayas State College of Agriculture | 40 | 1 | SUBTOTAL | 31,740 | 145 | | | | International Organizations | | | Australian International Cooperation for Agricultural Research | 1,667| 3 | International Atomic Energy Agency | 101 | 1 | International Foundation for Science | 447 | 2 | KUL-Belgium | 1,097 | 1 | NIES | - | 1 | UNESCO-Toyota | 364 | 1 | SUBTOTAL | 3,676 | 9 | | | | Local Private Organizations | | | East-West Seed Co., Inc. | 33 | 1 | LAKPUE Drug Co. | - | 1 | Procter & Gamble Distributing, Phil. Co. | 750 | 1 | Vic's Orchids and Ornamentals | 9 | 1 | SUBTOTAL | 792 | 4 | | | | TOTAL | 36,208 | 158 | ]

Research and Extension Manpower

As of October 2006, UPLB has 426 Research, Extension and Professional Staff (REPS), 24 of which are designated as REPS-Faculty and are given teaching functions by the university.
Number of REPS-Faculty by Employment Status and Educational Attainment
[table=tables-colorful-list Status|BS/AB|MS|PhD|Total Casual| - |- |- |- Substitute| - |- |- |- Temporary| - |- |- |- Permanent| - |- |24 |24 Total| - |- |24 |24 ]
Number of REPS by Employment Status and Educational Attainment
[table=tables-colorful-list Status|BS/AB|MS |PhD|Total Casual| 21 |10 |- |31 Substitute| 1 |- |- |1 Temporary| 41 |38 |2 |81 Permanent| 81 |138|70 |289 Total| 144|186|72 |402 ]

Important Facilities and Equipment

Research and extension at UPLB is enhanced and facilitated by the support of its major research and extension facilities and equipment. UPLB has a total land area of 14,665 hectares. Around 533 hectares serve as experimental sites, field laboratories and stations. The Makiling Forest Reserve (4,224 ha) and the three land grant locations, namely, La Carlota in the province of Negros Occidental, Siniloan (5,719 ha) and Paete (3,336) in the province of Laguna comprise 13,567 ha or 92.52% of the total land area. These vast tracts of land rich in flora and fauna are used as experimental areas for research and extension. Housed in the various research units in the campus are analytical laboratories, specialized laboratories for tissue culture, plant and animal biotechnology, nurseries, and greenhouses for plant breeding and plant collection. Other research facilities include a meteorological station, agricultural machinery development and testing, geographical information system and remote sensing laboratory, broadcasting facilities for AM and FM, pets and animal clinics, experimental animal farms, and other complementary facilities used in the conduct of research. Access to scientific information from local and foreign sources through the UPLB's Main Library and satellite reading libraries located at the unit levels greatly contributes to the development of research and extension proposals and the analysis of the generated data. The university's units are networked by an educational-level speed and bandwidth internet connectivity.

Important Research and Training Centers, Institutes and Units

UPLB has a number of important RDE units which administer the bulk of projects being implemented in the university. Most of these units have been built, operationalized and maintained through Presidential Proclamation:
  • National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (BIOTECH)
  • National Crop Protection Center (now supervised by the Crop Protection Cluster-CA)
  • Farming Systems and Soil Resources Institute (now Agricultural Systems Cluster-CA)
  • Post-harvest Horticulture Training and Research Center (now Post-harvest and Seed Sciences Division, Crop Science Cluster-CA)
  • Institute of Plant Breeding (now supervised by the Crop Science Cluster-CA)
  • Dairy Training and Research Institute (now supervised by the Animal and Dairy Sciences Cluster-CA)
  • Institute of Food Science and Technology (now supervised by the Food Science Cluster-CA)
  • La Granja Research and Training Station
  • UPLB Limnological Station
  • Makiling Center for Mountain Ecosystems
  • Training Center for Tropical Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability
  • Forest Development Center
  • College of Development Communication and its departments
  • College of Economics and Management and its departments
  • Agricultural Machinery Testing and Evaluation Center
  • Agricultural Modernization and Development Program
The Philippine government's Commission on Higher Education also recognized some of the university's units as Centers of Excellence / Centers of Development. [table=tables-colorful-list College|Unit|Center of Excellence|Center of Development College of Agriculture||Agriculture|- College of Arts and Sciences|Institute of Biological Sciences|Biology|- |Institute of Biological Sciences|Biology|- |Institute of Chemistry|Chemistry|- |Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Physics|Mathematics|Physics |Institute of Computer Sciences|-|Information Technology College of Development Communication||Communication Arts|- College of Engineering and Agro-industrial Technology|Institute of Agricultural Engineering|Agricultural Engineering|- College of Forestry and Natural Resources||Forestry|- College of Veterinary Medicine||Veterinary Medicine|- TOTAL|8|2 ]

Important Service Laboratories

UPLB operates several service laboratories, among of which are:

Animal Nutrition Analytical Service Laboratory

Animal and Dairy Sciences Cluster College of Agriculture The ANASL caters to students, animal farms, feed millers, and producers, providing them with analytical services to evaluate feeds fro potential value to animals. Samples can be analyzed to provide various clientele information on the nutritional quality of feeds. Among the services it offers are sample preparation, proximate analysis, mineral analysis, feed microscopy, test for chromic oxide, and other chemical analysis.

Biotechnology Central Analytical Service Laboratory

National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology The BASL handles routine chemical analysis of plant tissues, soils, fertilizers, raw materials, and by-products of fermentation processes. It provides analytical services to various clientele and is accredited and recognized by EMB-DENR, BAI-DA, DOH, FPA-DA, BFAD-DOH and other regulatory agencies. This recognition plays a significant role of BASL in assisting agencies in certifying analysis for product registration such as foods and feeds, fertilizers and pesticides, and in environmental quality monitoring.

Chemical Analytical Service Laboratory

Institute of Chemistry College of Arts and Science The CASL is the first service laboratory in the 1960s in the then College of Agriculture providing routine chemical analyses to researchers and students. It now provides routine chemical analyses, glass blowing services and short to long-term analytical projects for UPLB constituents, private individuals, research institutions, government and non-government organizations, and industries. CASL is accredited by the Philippines' Department of Health and documents are currently prepared based on ISO 17025 for accreditation by DENR-EMB and BFAD-DOH.

Chemical Control and Pesticide Toxicology Service Laboratory

National Crop Protection Center-Crop Protection Cluster College of Agriculture This facility is the first pesticide laboratory established in the Philippines in 1973. The laboratory has engaged in researches on the fate and decline of pesticides under tropical environment, monitoring of pesticide residues on agricultural crops and dietary risk assessment of pesticide residues. It has developed rapid test kits to determine organophosphate and carbamates pesticide residues. The laboratory is the only service laboratory in UPLB that is recognized by important regulatory agencies such as the Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority for analyses of pesticide products, determination of pesticide residues and risk assessment of pesticide residues in farm commodities.

Crop and Soils Analytical Service Laboratory

Institute of Plant Breeding-Crop Science Cluster College of Agriculture The CSASL is a BFAD-certified laboratory able to perform the full range of analyses from sample preparation to determination of plant and soil components through standard means such as colorimetry, titrimetry, and others. It can conduct proximate analysis; colorimetric analysis for sugars, starch, lysine, trypthophan and methionine; mineral analysis for phosphorus, magnesium, sulfur, boron, calcium, iron, zinc, potassium, sodium and inorganic carbon; nutritional and medicinal component analysis like flavonoids, antioxidants and tannins; and vitamin analysis for A, C, and E.

Electron Microscopy Service Laboratory

National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology The EMSL is the only service laboratory at UPLB catering to different clientele for ultra-structure analysis and support for sample preparation especially of biological specimens. It houses a transmission and scanning electron microscope, a digital microscope, along with supporting equipment.

Environmental Remote Sensing and Geo-information Laboratory

Institute of Renewable and Natural Resources College of Forestry and Natural Resources The ERSGL facility focuses on the use of GIS and remote sensing for agriculture forestry, and natural resources planning and management. The ERSGL contains the highest volume of digital maps outside of NAMRIA, having digitized six protected areas under the NIPAS system, all of the watersheds under the National Power Corporation, Mt. Makiling, the provinces of Quirino and Lanao del Sur, the Kaliwa watershed in Rizal and Quezon, the landslides of Dingalan in Aurora and Infanta and Nakar in Quezon, and the wetlands of the Philippines. It houses hardware and software including PC workstations, plotter, printer, scanner, GPS receivers, ArcView, ArcView Image Analysis, ArcGIS 8.3 with extensions (Spatial Analyst, 3D Analyst, Geo Statistical Analyst, and ENVI software for remote sensing and digital image processing).

Instrumentation Service Laboratory

Department of Electrical Engineering College of Engineering and Agro-industrial Technology The IL provides maintenance services and technical support to teaching, research and extension services of the university. It provides services for consumer electronics, information and communication technology, eletrco-mechanical and refrigerated equipments. Aside from university clients, small and medium-scale enterprises in Laguna and CALABARZON area can easily tap the laboratory for maintenance and upkeep requirements. Equipment such as audio/video systems, computers and associate peripherals, communications equipment, motors and pumps, transformers, refrigerated and heating equipment can be repaired in this laboratory.

UPLB Research, Development and Extension Projects

Ongoing Projects

A total of 120 ongoing projects were implemented by UPLB during 2006. The College of Agriculture (CA) implemented the most number of research projects totaling 70 projects. The Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension (OVCRE) and College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) followed this with 19 and 12 projects, respectively. In additional, the College of Forestry and Natural Resources (CFNR) had 10 projects, the College of Engineering and Agro-industrial Technology with 3 projects, and the College of Public Affairs (CPAf) with 2. The Colleges of Economics and Management (CEM), Human Ecology, Veterinary Medicine and SESAM had one ongoing project each.

Completed Projects

CA has the most number of completed projects (18), followed by the OVCRE (10) and the CAS (7). CPAf had two completed projects and one each for CEM and CFNR.
Number of ongoing and completed projects by college/unit (2006)
[table=tables-colorful-list College/ Unit | Ongoing | Completed College of Agriculture | 70 | 16 College of Arts and Sciences | 12 | 7 College of Engineering and Agro-industrial Technology | 3 | 0 College of Economics and Management | 1 | 1 College of Forestry and Natural Resources | 10 | 0 College of Human Ecology | 1 | 0 College of Public Affairs | 2 | 2 College of Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 0 School of Environmental Science and Management | 1 | 0 Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension | | | National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology | 10 | 10 Museum of Natural History | 1 | 0 OVCRE-Main Office | 1 | 1 STARRDEC | 7 | 0 | | | TOTAL | 120 | 38 ]

Project Evaluation

Evaluation and Endorsement of Proposals

The Project Monitoring and Evaluation Section (PMES) of OVCRE received a total of 135 proposals, 105 of which were submitted to outside funding agencies, and 30 for UPLB funding under the UPLB Basic Research Program. It also conducted the pre-screening of 67 capsule research proposals for DA-BAR funding on July 2006 wherein 10 proposals were endorsed for funding. Through UPLB's Office of the Chancellor, 93 proposals were endorsed to 20 government, private, and international funding agencies. About 91% (85 of 93) proposals were endorsed to government agencies which is 60% (12 of 20) of the total number of funding agencies. Only fourteen research proposals out of 30 which were submitted, were given funding under the UPLB Basic Research Program.

Evaluation of Ongoing Projects

The OVCRE conducted an evaluation/ review of a total 48 R and D projects for the period of January 2006 to November 2006. Evaluated were 41 externally-funded projects, and 7 individual studies. The PMES also attended in May 2006, the PCARRD-coordinated review of biotechnology projects which were mostly conducted by UPLB researchers. The PMES started in 2006 the quarterly review of ongoing projects, scheduled in February, May, August, and November of the year.

Intellectual Productivity and Awards Received

ISI-indexed Journal Articles and Books Endorsed to UP System

From January to October 2006, the OVCRE endorsed a total of 89 ISI-indexed journal articles: 56 were locally published, 37 were internationally published. There were 7 book/ book sections endorsed for the International Publication Award given by the UP System. The publications endorsed have been published from 2004-2006.
Number of publications received by the OVCRE in 2006
[table=tables-colorful-list Month|Locally Published ISI Journal Article|Internationally Published ISI Journal Article|Book/Book Section January|9|15|6 February|16|3|- March|2|2|- April|5|-|- May|6|1|- June|1|2|- July|5|5|- August|3|2|- September|1|6|1 October|8|1|- ||| TOTAL|56|37|7 ]

Database on Intellectual Productivity

From November 2005 until October 2006, the UPLB staff had put their research outputs into some knowledge products in published forms while some were papers presented in various conferences here in abroad. In 2006, the OVCRE database on intellectual productivity has listed a total of 48 articles published ISI-indexed journals, 1 published in an international refereed journal, 12 were published in local refereed journals, while there were also 16 books/ book chapters published. About 58 and 58 papers were presented in international and local conferences, respectively. For the three-year period (2004-2006), the most number of publication outputs as well as the papers presented in local and international conferences was recorded in 2005. The ISI-indexed journals, book/book chapter/ sections, however were slightly higher in 2006 than in 2004. Also, the papers presented in international and local conferences were higher in 2006 than in 2004.
UPLB intellectual productivity, 2004-2006
[table=tables-colorful-list Category|2004|2005|2006|Total ISI-indexed journal article|46|86|48|180 International refereed journals article|1|8|1|10 Local refereed journal article|16|5|12|53 Book chapter/section|14|18|16|48 Papers presented in international conferences|21|71|56|148 Papers presented in local conferences|10|91|58|159 ]

Awards Received

Awards for research and extension outputs come in the form of plaques of recognition, trophies, research grants, as well as cash prizes. UPLB's CA-ASC was a recipient of the Presidential Gawad Lingkod Bayan Award 2006 given by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and the Civil Service Commission citing the accomplishment of the Farmer-Scientist Training Program in corn-based production systems for sustainable agricultural development: further expansion of pilot areas in Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao. National government agencies such as FIDA, CHED, DA, DA-BAR, DOST and its councils, NAST, NRCP, other professional and international organizations, UPLB as well as provincial and regional government agencies give these awards. For the year in review, the UPLB staff and their research works were recipients of 12 provincial/regional, 34 national and three (3) international awards.
Research and extension-related awards received by UPLB, 2004-2006
[table=tables-colorful-list Year|Provincial/Regional|National|International 2004|19|73|- 2005|22|67|4 2006|21|67|5 ||| TOTAL|62|207|8 ]

Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension

Vice-Chancellor Enrico P. Supangco

DR. ENRICO P. SUPANGCO, Doctor of Philosophy in Range Science from Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA (1990) is the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension.

He has served UPLB for about 28 years starting as Research Assistant in 1977 and held various administrative positions in the College of Agriculture, UPLB. Dr. Supangco has served as chair and member of various department, college, university and national committees.

He is recipient of 7 awards from various associations, including the 2003 Merial (Phils.) Inc. Outstanding Teacher in Animal Science from the Philippine Society of Animal Science, and the 2001 Most Oustanding Research Manager from Philippine Association of Research Managers.

His research interests are in cattle-rice integration, ruminant nutrition and decision-aid modelling.

Staff of the Vice-Chancellor

Main Section

StaffDesignationSalary Grade
Arnel R. BallesfinAdministrative Assistant III9-8
Florante A. CruzUniversity Research Associate II14-1
Rosario G. GabatinAdministrative Officer IV15-7
Erlinda C. MendozaAdministrative Officer IV15-6
Thelma P. MorenoProject Development Officer II15-5
Luzviminda S. OcfemiaProject Development Officer II15-6
Betty P. ReyesAdministrative Officer I11-1
Nole M. UmaliAdministrative Assistant IV12-4

Project Monitoring and Evaluation Section

StaffDesignationSalary Grade
Evelyn E. BiteAdministrative Officer II15-7
Lily O. BorlazaUniversity Extension Specialist III18-5
Myrna A. DavacData Entry Machince Operator II8-8
Alex A. GenilUtility Worker II3-1
Lydia A. LapastoraUniversity Extension Associate I12-1
Jaine C. ReyesUniversity Extension Specialist IV22-6

Offices/ Programs Supervised by the OVCRE

Intellectual Property Rights Office

StaffDesignationSalary Grade
Elias B. Abao, Jr.Development Management Officer II15-4
Perrose L. ComendadorUniversity Extension Associate I12-1

Southern Tagalog Agricultural Resources Research and Development Consortium

StaffDesignationSalary Grade
Almira G. MagcawasScience Research Specialist13-1
Karen Rose M. TubayScience Research Assistant I9-1
Amy Melissa B. MalaluanScience Research Assistant I9-1
Raymand Vincent C. CabreraUniversity Extension Associate I12-1
Renato E. ApolinarioAdministrative Aide VI6-1

UPLB-CHED Zonal Research Center for Regions IV and V

StaffDesignationSalary Grade
Ma. Ellenita G. De CastroProject Development Officer III18-1
May M. SerranoProject Development Officer II15-1

Contact Details

Postal Address:
Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension
Room 207, 2nd Floor, Abelardo G. Samonte Hall
University of the Philippines Los Baños
College, Laguna 4031
PHILIPPINES

Telephone: + 63 049 536 2354
Telefax: + 63 049 536 3454

E-mail: ovcre(at)uplb(dot)edu(dot)ph
Website: www.uplb.edu.ph/rde

RDE News and Updates

For research and development news and updates, please visit our newscenter: http://www.uplb.edu.ph/uplb-news/ovcre-news

University Guidelines and Protocol on RDE

The following files in PDF are the current policies and guidelines being implemented by the university. To view/ save a copy of the file in your computer, click on the links below:

New

Year 2000 and below

Researcher's Manual in Conducting Research

The OVCRE has prepared its UPLB Research Manual in 2002, which covers basic but important information about UPLB research and how it is administered. Below are some information most needed by any staff who are currently doing or will be planning on to do research activities.
UPLB Research Manual
A digital copy (2002 information) is also available upon request through email. Please contact the publisher at ovcre(at)uplb(dot)edu(ph).

Developing capsule and detailed proposals

Developing proposals

Call for proposals from Basic Research Fund and external funding agencies (FAs) come anytime during the year. Research proponents prepare proposals in accordance with the thrusts and objectives specified by the funding agency.
Basic Research
This program provides financial assistance for basic studies in the natural sciences and mathematics, social sciences and the humanities. It is also supportive of UPLB’s teaching function and is responsive to national development needs. Priority is given to proponents who have no other research study/project and/or have recently received their MS or PhD degrees and wish to do follow-up studies on their thesis or dissertation. Under the program, there is no provision for honoraria of study leaders, equipment and capital outlay. Every last quarter of the year, the OVCRE calls for submission of basic research proposals. The deadline for submission is November, evaluation is conducted in December and implementation starts January. Funds are released on a quarterly basis.
Applied Research
Some agencies, such as the DA-BAR require the initial submission of capsule proposals, and when considered for funding, proponents are requested to submit detailed proposals. Proposal format depends on the requirement of the funding agency and the proponents, for faster proposal processing, should strictly follow the formats required by DOST and its councils, DA-BAR and other funding agencies.
Processing research proposals
Before research proposals are endorsed to the funding agency for consideration, they undergo evaluation at the UPLB level through the OVCRE. The OVCRE records and logs receipt of incoming proposals, conducts pre-evaluation based on UPLB thrusts and checks for duplication of efforts. They are referred to the identified critics for review and sent back to proponent for revision (if necessary). The OVCRE prepares endorsement of the reviewed proposal for favorable consideration by the UPLB Chancellor. The Office of the Chancellor prepares the final endorsement and transmits the proposal to the funding agency.
Pointers to proponents
The proponent should review the budgetary requirement for the project in terms of the following:
  • Salaries of the project personnel, honoraria rates should be in accordance with the salary rates approved by the funding agency, i.e. DOST, DA-BAR.
  • The administrative cost (indirect cost) of the project is dependent on the following schemes:
    • Below P100,000 (5%)
    • P101,000 – P200,000 (7%)
    • P201,000 – above (10%)
  • Payment of training fees, travel insurance, attendance in international or local conferences, collaboration with other agencies should be explicit in the MOA/MOU

Preparing and processing a MOA/ MOU

Developing a MOA or MOU

Once a research study/project is approved for implementation, a Memorandum of Agreement/Memorandum of Understanding between the funding agency and the UPLB is prepared by the proponent. There are funding agencies that have their own draft MOA/MOU that the proponent can refer to. UPLB has also its own proforma draft of the MOA/MOU and is available at the UPLB Legal Office. PCARRD, on the other hand, has an Omnibus MOA with UPLB.

Processing a MOA or MOU

The draft MOA/MOU is referred to both parties for comments. From the funding agency, the MOA/MOU is referred to the UPLB Legal Office for review, and sent back to the proponent/funding agency for revision based on the comments of the OVCRE and the Legal Office. The OVCRE studies the agreements/terms and recommends the MOA/MOU to the UPLB Chancellor who approves/signs the agreement and sends to the funding agency. The funding agency approves and notarizes the MOA/MOU. The proponent/OVCRE/Legal Office and OC are provided copies of the agreement. The OC will send copy of the MOA/MOU to UP Diliman for confirmation. After the MOA is approved, the funding agency issues the notice to proceed to the OVCRE on the attention of the proponent. The funding agency also furnishes the proponent a copy of the notice.

Processing release of project funds

The funding agency issues the check for the approved project. Upon receipt, the OVCRE gets an accounting code from the Accounting Division, deposits the check to the Cash Division and furnishes the funding agency with the copy of the official receipt. An advice of sub-allotment is prepared by the OVCRE, copies of which are furnished to the following: proponent (original copy), duplicate copy each to the Accounting/Internal Audit/Funding Agency. Funds are released on a quarterly basis. Expenses for the operation of the study shall be disbursed in accordance with the Advice of Sub-Allotment and subject to existing accounting and auditing rules.

Hiring and appointing project personnel

In preparing the appointment papers of the following:
  • Project/study leader, project staff/administrative support staff who are UPLB personnel, NGW personnel such as URA, Labroratory Technician/aide, animal caretaker, agricultural technician, laborer etc.- prepare the basic papers for each, submitted and processed through channels.
  • Contract Labor (Non-Government Worker), or NGWs hired charged against Other Services - make a letter request to hire contract labor to the dean/unit head for approval. The approved request will be attached to the appointment, processed through channels. The duration for contract labor is only for a maximum of three (3) months. Appointments maybe renewed but with a gap of one week.
  • Only permanent and temporary staffs are allowed to be assigned as administrative support staff in the project. UPLB staff whose appointment is in substitute or contractual basis is not allowed to be given additional assignment as administrative support staff.
  • Non-UPLB personnel such a study leader and project staff, make a formal request to the Chancellor to be able to appoint a study leader/project staff. The request should attach a letter from the supervisor allowing the involvement of non-UPLB personnel to the project. Upon approval of the request by the Chancellor, a letter order, will be processed and issued by the Human Resource Development Office (HRDO) that will serve as the appointment of the staff involved.

Managing the program/ project/ study

Managing the program/ project/ study

Requesting change of date of project implementation

The start and end of the project are specific in the MOA/MOU. Implementation, however, may be set depending on the release of funds or upon issuance of the notice to proceed. Proponents may want to defer or decide on when to start the project depending on the need factors such as climate, cropping season, availability of personnel and other justifiable reasons. For deferment of project implementation, the funding agency should be properly informed through an official communication coursed through channels as per Memo. No. 96 series of 2001 of the Office of the Chancellor.

Requesting for realignment/ reprogramming of program/ project funds

Researchers may request for reprogramming or transferring of funds from one line budget item to another when the need arises, provided funds are available. Reprogramming/Transfer is considered major when the transfer request is from one line-item budget to another, minor when the request is within the line-item budget. The request should pass through channels. For reprogramming request of more than 30-33% of the approved budget, the OVCRE recommends the request for approval by the funding agency in consideration of the following conditions:
  • Transfer of funds (major) from equipment to maintenance and operating expenses (MOE) or personnel services (PS); and
  • Request for additional project personnel
For DOST/PCARRD-funded projects, the OVCRE recommends to the OC the approval of reprogramming/transfer of funds for request of less than 30% of the approved budget. For more than 30%, minor or major request for reprogramming/transfer of funds is to be approved by PCARRD. Similar requests for PCIERD, PCASTRD-funded projects are to be approved by the concerned funding agency. For PHILRice and other international funding agencies, requests for reprogramming or transfer of funds (regardless of the amount) are approved by the funding agency.

Requesting for audited financial reports

An Audited Financial Report (AFR) is prepared by the Accounting Division indicating the expenditures and the remaining balance of the project for a certain period. There are funding agencies that require the submission of AFR quarterly, but there are those that require AFR every six months.

Requesting transfer of project leadership

Based on the new delegation of authority, the OVCRE approves the request for transfer of project leadership, with copy of the approved request together with the bio-data of the new project leader submitted to the funding agency.

Requesting for use of unobligated balances

Unobligated or unexpended funds maybe used while awaiting for the next release of the budget allotment. For PCARRD-funded projects, the OVCRE approves the request for use of UB. For unused balances from previous year may be used for the same line item budget for the following year and for other necessary items, provided that the use is approved by PCARRD. Unobligated balances (UB) of funds coming DOST, PCIERD and PCASTRD from the previous year may be deducted from the release for the following year unless requested as an additional budget for the following year. Request for use of UB of other grants is with the respective funding agency’s approval.

Requesting for program/ project extension

Requests for extension, renewal, termination of the projects are made through the OVCRE substantiated by written communication, evaluation results and annual reports.

Requesting for bridging funds

Researchers can tap other funds while waiting for the release of budget. The project leader can charge additional expenses of the project from the unit’s share of administrative indirect) cost on the project (40% of the 10% of the total project cost.) Through the bridging fund (Endowment Fund), the project leader can request from the OVCRE an amount to pay for unpaid salaries (maximum of three months) of project personnel. The amount must be replenished as soon as the project’s budget is released.

Preparing for program/ project review

Projects are monitored in terms of financial and technical aspects. The financial status of the project is monitored by the Accounting Division, the OVCRE also monitors the finances, as well as the appointments of personnel, various requests and the advice of sub-allotments. The monitoring of the technical aspect is left to the Technical Evaluation Team formed by the OVCRE composed of selected evaluators through the technical reports submitted by the researchers.

Guidelines for evaluators during in-house review of completed R and E projects

The in house evaluation of R&E projects is conducted to review the project vis-a-vis the accomplishments and outputs, identify weak areas, and make suggestions to improve or develop the project.

  1. The evaluators should be guided by the following points:

    Were the objectives attained through the activity/methodology undertaken?

  2. Were the activities conducted in accordance with the work plan? If there were some changes in the project, were the revisions justified and acceptable?
  3. Were the funds utilized in accordance with the scheduled activities?
  4. Were there constraints in the implementation of the project? If the constraints in the project have been attended to, what were the actions taken?
  5. Were there significant findings that may now be utilized by various clienteles?
  6. Are the potential impacts of the project relevant to the Philippines or community?


  7. During evaluation, each presenter shall be given twenty (20) minutes to present his/her project outputs and fifteen (15) minutes for the open forum/discussion..

  8. As team of evaluators, each member will review the projects during evaluation session indicated in the schedule.

    • For each project to be evaluated, a chair/moderator among members will be chosen so that each member of the team can contribute to the evaluation process. The chair/moderator will consolidate the comments and suggestions, and settle any conflicting issue on the team’s recommendations.

    • The Team may opt to give the member’s comments and suggestions to OVCRE secretariat for consolidation after the presentation and oral discussion, and to meet separately should conflicting issue arises.


  9. The evaluation team will recommend if a project is to be renewed, extended or terminated considering the objectives, accomplishments, and the relevance of the project.

  10. The individual evaluation sheet, and the consolidated/summarized evaluators' comments, suggestions and recommendations used during the review should be submitted to OVCRE after every session or anytime within the day of evaluation.

Guidelines for evaluators during in-house review of on-going R and E projects

  1. The in-house evaluation of R&E projects is conducted to review the project vis-a-vis the accomplishments and outputs, identify weak areas, and make suggestions to improve or develop the project.

  2. The evaluators shall attend at least a whole evaluation session (i.e. morning or afternoon session) and shall come on time. In case an evaluator cannot attend the evaluation proper, the evaluator should inform the Project Monitoring and Evaluation Section (PMES) at least three (3) days before the scheduled evaluation.

  3. The evaluators should read the reports to be reviewed before the presentation. The focus of the evaluation proper will be on the questions, comments and suggestions regarding the project being evaluated.

  4. The evaluators should be guided by the following points:

    • Are the objectives attained through the activity/methodology undertaken?

    • Are the activities undertaken and plan of activities in accordance with the work plan? If there are some changes in the project, are the revisions justified and acceptable? Would you recommend changes in the methodology? Why?
    • Are the funds utilized in accordance with the scheduled activities?
    • Are there constraints in the implementation of the project? If the constraints in the project have been attended to, what are the actions taken?
    • Are there significant findings that may now be utilized by various clienteles?
    • Are the potential impacts of the project relevant to the Philippines or community?


  5. During evaluation, each presenter shall be given twenty (20) minutes to present his/her project outputs and fifteen (15) minutes for the open forum/discussion.

  6. As team of evaluators, each member will review the projects during evaluation session indicated in the schedule.

    • For each project to be evaluated, a chair/moderator among members will be chosen so that each member of the team can contribute to the evaluation process. The chair/moderator will consolidate the comments and suggestions, and settle any conflicting issue on the team’s recommendations.

    • The Team may opt to give the members’ individual comments and suggestions to OVCRE secretariat for consolidation after the presentation and oral discussion, and to meet separately should conflicting issue arises.


  7. The evaluation team will recommend if a project is to be renewed, extended or terminated considering the objectives, accomplishments, and the relevance of the project.

  8. The individual evaluation sheet, and the consolidated/summarized evaluators' comments, suggestions and recommendations used during the review should be submitted to OVCRE after every session or anytime within the day of evaluation.

Guidelines for project leaders/ presenters of projects for review

Listed below are the guidelines project leaders should keep in mind when their projects will be reviewed:

  • In case the project leader is not available, the study leader may present the accomplishments of the project and answer the questions during the open forum in behalf of the project leader.

  • Once the schedule of review is finalized, it must be strictly followed. In case a postponement is unavoidable, request for postponement of the review must be made not later than one week after the receipt of notice of evaluation. A written request with justification for the postponement of the evaluation should be submitted to the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension (VCRE) noted by the unit head/director and college dean. Submission of request and justification does not guarantee its approval.

  • One week before the presentation, the project leader should inform the OVCRE on the equipment needed during the presentation. The presenters are encouraged to use audiovisual aids in the presentation.

  • Presenters should come at least ten (10) minutes earlier than their scheduled time of evaluation.

  • During evaluation, each presenter shall be given twenty (20) minutes for the project presentation and fifteen (15) minutes for the open forum/discussion.

  • The presentation should be comprehensive and should focus on the accomplishments for the period under review (outputs, activities undertaken etc.) vis-à-vis the project's objectives.

  • The presenter should take note of the questions, comments and suggestions of the panel regarding the accomplishments of the project being evaluated in relation to its objectives.

Guidelines in the evaluation of programs and projects

Project evaluation is done by the Project Monitoring and Evaluation Section of the Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension.

Below are the important information related to project evaluation in the university:

Schedule of evaluation

  • The evaluation of ongoing UPLB research projects both internally (i.e., UPLB Basic Research Fund, Research Trust fund) and externally funded (i.e., DA-BAR, DOST, PCARRD, NRCP, CHED) shall be conducted once a year
  • The PMES shall coordinate with the funding agency a synchronized schedule of evaluation of UPLB with that of the funding agency. As much as possible, a joint evaluation between UPLB and funding agency shall be conducted.
  • In case a joint evaluation is not possible, the funding agency shall invite a representative from the UPLB team of evaluators to attend the funding agency's evaluation, and provide UPLB-OVCRE, a copy of the summary of evaluation results.
  • The schedule of UPLB evaluation shall be done quarterly- in February, May, August, and November.
  • For projects due for completion, the evaluation shall be scheduled before the termination of the project.
    • Projects ending in April, May, June will be reviewed on February
    • Projects ending in July, August, September will be reviewed on May
    • Projects ending in October, November, December will be reviewed on August
    • Projects ending in January, February, March of succeeding year will be reviewed on November
  • Evaluation, however, may take place at a later date in consideration of the following:
    • The funding agency approved the change of implementation date.
    • The funding agency approved the extension of project to complete activities and/or use of unexpended balance.
    • The nature of the project (i.e., short duration, seasonality of crops).
    • The project shall not request for extension and shall instead present completed research for evaluation
  • The PMES staff shall finalize the schedule of evaluation, and accordingly send communication to the project leaders and funding agencies in this regard.

Identification of projects to be evaluated

  • The PMES shall identify the programs/projects to be evaluated and shall notify the researchers whose projects are due for evaluation at least two months before the scheduled evaluation.
  • The PMES shall acquire an updated copy of a complete listing of projects from OVCRE comptrollers. List should include project title, project leader, funding agency, project duration and date of recent budget release.
  • The PMES, in comparison, shall check the project title, project leader, funding agency, project duration and date of recent budget release of newly acquired list of ongoing projects with the previous list. For discrepancies, the PMES staff shall confer with the comptrollers, funding agency or project leader concerned. The PMES staff shall indicate previous entry (i.e. project title, project leader etc.) with parentheses for future reference.
  • The project duration may not indicate the actual project implementation, hence, the PMES staff shall confirm with the OVCRE comptrollers and/or researchers the actual date of implementation of the project and schedule the evaluation based on the actual implementation date.
  • The PMES staff shall prepare a list of projects to be evaluated for each evaluation session.

UPLB Evaluators

  • Two months before the year ends, a pool of UPLB evaluators for applied (externally funded) and basic (internally funded) researches shall be constituted for recommendation to the Chancellor for approval. In the selection of the members in the pool, their expertise and the current list of ongoing researches to be reviewed for the following year shall be considered.
  • The pool of evaluators shall consist of: a) core evaluators with expertise in the areas of statistics, crops, livestock, social sciences and economics, and who shall be present in all evaluation sessions, if possible; and b) specialist evaluators who shall be selected based on the area of discipline of the research projects being evaluated.
  • Before the evaluation, the PMES staff shall select the evaluators from the pool of evaluators as to their availability. The evaluators shall confirm their availability at least a week before the start of the evaluation and the PMES staff shall remind them three days before the start of the evaluation.
  • The PMES staff shall provide the evaluators report of the project leaders at least ten (10) days before the scheduled evaluation.
  • The honoraria for the evaluators shall be processed twice a year (i.e., midyear and end of the year).

Notification of Evaluation

  • For projects to be evaluated, the PMES staff shall send a notice of evaluation, a written report format, accomplishment report format, and guidelines for presentation to the project leaders concerned. The letter of notice shall include the name of the project leader, title of the project to be evaluated, the date of evaluation, deadline of submission of reports, number of copies of annual report to be submitted and other instructions.
  • The PMES shall confirm with the project leaders and/or project staff the receipt of notice of evaluation, deadline of submission of reports, number of copies of annual report to be submitted, and if there is any change in the evaluation schedule.

Documents for Evaluation

  • The PMES shall follow up the annual reports with cover letter properly coursed through channels, signed by the project leader and noted by the dean/director of the college/unit. The cover letter should indicate request for extension if there is a plan for any.
  • The PMES shall record the receipt of annual reports in the Incoming/Outgoing Research Report Logbook. The entry shall include date of receipt, where the report was received (Administration or DA-BAR RDE Network Headquarters Office), funding agency, program/project title, project leader, number of copies, presence or absence of cover letter, PMES ID and remarks.
  • The PMES shall send copies of the annual reports with summary of accomplishments, comment sheet, guidelines for evaluators and schedule of evaluation to the evaluators ten (10) days before the start of evaluation. The written report and evaluation sheets should be properly labeled with a PMES ID.

Venue and Facilities

  • The PMES shall reserve the venue four (4) weeks before evaluation and order snacks from accredited food caterer three (3) days before evaluation.
  • The PMES shall inquire from the project leaders the equipment and materials they shall need for presentation. The presenters shall be informed that those who are going to do a power point presentation should bring their own computers.
  • The PMES shall make sure the availability of the equipment needed during the presentation including slide projector, overhead projector, LCD projector, projector screen, laser pointer, sound system and computers.

Evaluation Procedures

  • The PMES shall provide the evaluators with a copy of the Guidelines of the Review of UPLB Completed and Ongoing R&D Projects and the presenters with a copy of the Guidelines and Format for Presenters of UPLB Ongoing Research Projects and Report Format before the evaluation.
  • The PMES shall make the necessary physical arrangements on the venue, facilities, food and materials to be used during the evaluation.
  • The PMES shall document the proceedings during the evaluation through audio and written records.
  • The PMES shall remind the evaluators of the submission of the evaluation sheets and/or synthesized comments of the evaluators after every session or within the day.
  • The PMES shall designate the moderator who shall see to the smooth conduct of the evaluation and providing a summary/recapitulation of the evaluation.

Transmittal of Evaluation Documents

  • The PMES shall collect the evaluation sheets from the evaluators and/or the synthesized comments, suggestions and recommendations of the evaluators within the day of evaluation and encode them in the computer.
  • The PMES shall transcribe the tapes or notes on the proceedings and prepare a draft of evaluation result in case the evaluators for the session were not able to formulate their synthesized comments, suggestions and recommendations.
  • The PMES send the evaluation result to the evaluators concerned for checking and/or addition of comments, suggestions and recommendations, collect the edited draft and finalize the evaluation results.
  • The PMES shall prepare transmittal letters regarding the results of the evaluation, and send them to the project leaders concerned.
  • The PMES shall send the evaluation result and annual reports of the projects to the funding agency concerned. The project titles, project leader and project duration shall be indicated. The PMES shall ensure that OVCRE has a copy of the receipt of evaluation results with the funding agency's proof of receipt as required by the internal audit. This is required by COA as a proof that the project had submitted the report.
  • The PMES shall accordingly inform the funding agency on the continuance or changes in the evaluation.

Preparing and submitting reports

  • Six (6) copies of progress report are submitted to the funding agency
  • 14 copies of the annual report are submitted for use in the joint UPLB and funding agency annual in-house review of projects; and
  • five (5) copies of the terminal report are submitted two months after the termination or completion of the project.
Both ongoing and completed research projects under the applied/basic research grants, research trust, and those funded by DOST, PCARRD, DAR, DA-BAR and other government agencies are required to be presented in an annual in-house review. The evaluators recommend the renewal or extension of the research projects. Completed projects, on the other hand, are also evaluated prior to the submission of the terminal report 30 days after the termination of the project. Researchers are required to present their results.

Applying for a copyright, registration or patent

University authors and inventors are assisted by the Intellectual Property Rights Office (IPRO) in their application for Copyright and patents for copyrightable works and potential patentable technology, respectively. The IPRO shall assist the creator(s)/author(s) or inventors in the preparation of the required documents. For more forms and information, please contact the IPRO's focal person at
ebabaojr(at)yahoo(dot)com.

Applying for a copyright

  1. All copyrightable works will be jointly owned by the Creator/Author and UPLB.
  2. The Creator/s or Author/s (Assignor/s) and UPLB (Assignee) execute(s) a Deed of Assignment wherein they are made joint authors. The authors shall submit to IPRO two (2) copies of the written work for deposit to the Copyright Office.
  3. The accomplished Deed of Assignment is notarized.
  4. The IPRO accomplishes the Application for Copyright, have the form notarized by any notary public.
  5. The IPRO submits the following to the Copyright Office and shall pay the necessary fees and documentary stamps:
    • Deed of Assignment
    • Copyright Application
    • Two (2) copies of the written work
  6. All fees (notarial, application, documentary stamps) shall be shouldered by UPLB.
  7. The IPRO receives and files the copyright registration.

Applying for a patent

  1. The unit (where the inventor comes from) informs the IPRO of a potential patentable technology (product, process, utility model, etc.)
  2. The IPRO confers/meets with the inventor for a preliminary evaluation of the technology. If found patentable, the inventor is advised to prepare all the required documents, namely:
    • Abstract
    • Disclosure
    • Detailed background
    • Review of related literature
    • Invention disclosure report
  3. The IPRO reviews/collates all the required documents, prepares patent application papers and prepares endorsement signed by the Vice Chancellor for Research and Extension to the Chancellor through the UPLB Legal Office.
  4. The Legal Office reviews and endorses the Patent Application to the Chancellor.
  5. The Chancellor signs the Patent Application.
  6. The IPRO submits the notarized Patent Application to the IP Philippines Office.
For more information on the intellectual property rights, visit the IP Philippines website.

RDE Staff Development

To harmonize policies, procedures and standards in the matters of professional development across the UP System, the UP Office of the Vice-President for Academic Affairs prepared a manual "In Support of a Culture of Scholarship and Excellence: Faculty Development, Grants and Awards" in 2004.

Although the manual is targeted for faculty, REPS can also avail, where it is possible, of the opportunities given by the UP System especially when it comes to grants and awards.

We are providing the sections of the manual (in PDF) for download:

  1. Introduction
  2. System Faculty Development Program
  3. Inter-campus Program
  4. Creative and Research Scholarship Program
  5. Academic Distinction Program
  6. Application and Nomination Forms


In the light of the professionalism program of UP, several staff development programs for academic and administrative personnel are implemented. The following opportunities are available/ provided for research and extension staff.

Graduate studies

REPS and faculty involved in RDE can pursue graduate studies at the masters or doctoral levels in local or foreign universities to strenghten their capabilities. The following options are available:

Scholarship available on a limited and competitive basis

Some local and/or foreign institutions provide scholarship support/financial assistance for graduate studies in specific fields of specialization. The scholarship is a package of financial support for the duration of the study, the institution where the recipient will pursue his/ her study, service contract to the mother institutions or employer, etc.

Study leave with pay or study leave without pay

Non-teaching staff (which includes REPS) with permanent appointment status and with at least very satisfactory performance rating for the last two rating periods prior to the application are qualified to apply for the full-time study leave with pay/fellowship to enable them to pursue graduate studies (Memo dated January 18, 1999 issued by UP VPFA J. R. Licuanan)

Others may prefer to enjoy study leave without pay which will not entail signing of a contract of service agreement.

Graduate study under the reduced fee program

REPS and faculty involved in research and extension can also enjoy the privelege to study at reduced fee. Under this program, an employee is allowed to register a maximum of six (6) academic units per semester for a minimal fee set by the university. Any personnel who wishes to study under this program is required to get permission from his/her immediate supervisor or unit head and to prepare a revised work schedule.

Participation in conferences, seminars, workshops, and conventions

REPS are allowed to attend/ participate in activities that promote exchange of knowledge and scientific information. They either serve as resource speaker, poster paper presenter, or oral paper presenter. Agencies/ organizations that sponsor such activities send invitation to the university, including the particulars for participation. Expenses are either provided by these agencies (partially or fully), charged to project funds, or solicited from other sources.

Special detail assignment to outside agencies (full-time or part-time)

As part of the university's commitment to support other agencies that need technical assistance, other faculty members or REPS are allowed to work under special detail arrangements without taking a leave of absence from the university. Under this scheme, they still receive their regular pay from the university while getting additional remuneration from the agency where they will be detailed. They may be given attractive compensation packages in case they no longer get their pay from the university.

Training

Traiing for specialized skills here or abroad may be available at times to REPS and faculty members as part of a certain project requirement. Individual staff may scout for training opportunities. Training participants are required to sign a service contract with the university for specific periods depending on the duration of the training.

Exchange visit or study tours

Some academic or research institutions request from the university exchange visits or study tour arrangements for their researchers, faculty and students. The common objective of this activity is to widen the staff's exposure to researches and extension programs being conducted in specific areas of interest. Specific provisions for the participants are agreed upon by host agencies.

Conversion of REPS items to REPS-Faculty items

REPS with teaching experience (i.e thos have been appointed affiliate faculty) and those with outstanding research and extension accomplishments can be appointed to teaching positions in units where their qualifications are best suited.

Limited practice/ exercise of profession

The university allows appointment of faculty and REPS to other agencies for special detail, secondment, or teaching in other institutions with which UPLB has MOAs subject to existing university rules and regulations. Details about their terms of reference, payment and other benefits are covered in the specific MOA.

Trainings at UPLB

The University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB) is involved not only in instruction, but also in research and extension.

Its intellectual resources, through research, continue to generate new ideas and technologies designed to benefit various clientele. Through the University’s extension function, these ideas and technologies are disseminated to intended beneficiaries with the goal of attaining social change and development.

Among the regular extension activities of UPLB is the offering of non-degree Short Courses and Training Programs which provide practical knowledge and skills in various subject matters.

These courses are offered annually mostly during summer months of April, May, and June but they can also be offered any time of the year upon the request of an organization or a group of interested parties.

You can download our 2008 catalogue of short courses and training programs in two (2) PDF-based formats:

1. Continuously paged document, for easy reading in a computer
2. Booklet form, ready for back to back printing

The 2007 catalogue offered by the UPLB units in 2007 is also available as a download.

In addition to the listed courses, UPLB also designs and conducts capability building, continuing education programs to tailor-fit the needs of the requesting organizations.

For more information and inquiries, please contact the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Extension (OVCRE), UP Los Baños, College, Laguna, telephone numbers (049) 536-5326/2354 and telefax (049) 536-3341 or send email message to ovcre(at)uplb(dot)edu(dot)ph or ovcre_sctp(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)ph.

UPLB and UP System Grants, Awards and Recognition

UPLB and the UP System recognizes the contribution of its faculty and staff to the body of knowledge by providing grants, awards and recognitions. Aside from the university, many government agencies have rewarded UPLB as an institution, and its personnel for various scientific and administrative achievements. A list of some of the most important awards and their respective deadlines are listed here: http://www.uplb.edu.ph/rde/awards/others

Below are some of the major awards given by UPLB and the System:


UPLB OUTSTANDING PERSONNEL/ PROGRAMS AWARDS

UPLB Outstanding Researcher/ Research Program/ Creative Artist Award

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

UPLB Outstanding Extensionist/ Extension Program/Project Award

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

UP SYSTEM CREATIVE AND RESEARCH SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM

Creative Work and Research Grant

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

Textbook Writing Grant

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

System Support for International Publications of Literary Works

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

Research Incentive for Lateral Entrants

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

Sabbatical Research Grant

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DISTINCTION PROGRAM

University Professors Grant

Eligibility
Benefits/ Contract Rate

University Professors Emeritus Grant

Eligibility
Benefits/ Contract Rate

International Publication Award for Journal Articles

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

International Publication Award for Books/ Chapters of Books

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

International Award for the Arts

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

Gawad sa Natatanging Publikasyon sa Filipino

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

Advanced Technology Award

Eligibility
Scope
Benefits/ Contract Rate

Awards Given By Other Organizations

Here is a list of some of the research and extension-related awards and recognition given by various government agencies every year. For more information about the awards, you may access the award-giving body's website, or inquire from the Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension if call for nominations have already been received by the university.

The deadline of submission of nomination documents may vary from year to year, depending on the schedules set by the organization.

Note: This list includes the awards being given by UPLB and the UP System.

AwardAward-Giving BodyDeadline for Submission
UPLB Most Outstanding Researcher/ Research Program/ Creative ArtistUPLBFebruary 8
UPLB Most Extensionist/ Extension Program/ Project AwardUPLBFebruary 8
Lingkod Bayan AwardsCSCMarch 30
Dangal ng Bayan AwardsCSCMarch 30
Pag-asa AwardsCSCMarch 30
Gawad Saka Outstanding Agricultural ScientistDAApril 2
Most Distinguished Alumnus/ Alumna AwardUPAAApril 16
Lifetime Distinguished Achievement AwardUPAAApril 16
Outstanding Professional AwardUPAAApril 16
Community Service AwardUPAAApril 16
CHED Republica Awards (National and Zonal Outstanding Research and Publication Awards)CHEDMarch 15
CHED Best Higher Education Institution Research ProgramCHEDMarch 28
M.S. Swaminathan Outstanding Research AwardLBSCFIMay 4
F.S. Pollisco R and D AwardLBSCFIMay 4
PARRFI R and D AwardLBSCFIMay 4
F.O. Tesoro Technology Transfer AwardLBSCFIMay 4
Dr. Eusebio Y. Garcia Award for Molecular Biology and Molecular PathologyNRCP-DOSTJune 16
Pantas Award for Outstanding ResearcherPCARRD-DOSTJune 30
Pantas Award for Outstanding Research AdministratorPCARRD-DOSTJune 30
Tanglaw Award for Most Outstanding Research InstitutionPCARRD-DOSTJune 30
Gawad LIBER in Science EducationSEI-DOSTJuly 31
Outstanding R and D Project in Advanced Science and TechnologyPCASTRD-DOSTSeptember 16
Outstanding Science and Technology Communicator AwardNAST-DOSTOctober 15
International Award for the ArtsUP SystemNovember 30
Gawad sa Natatanging Publikasyon sa FilipinoUP SystemNovember 30
Advanced Technology AwardUP SystemNovember 30
President's Award for Innovation in TeachingUP SystemNovember 30
Washington SyCip Award for Best General Education Learning MaterialUP SystemNovember 30
Concepcion Dadufalza Award for Distinguished AchievementUP SystemNovember 30
International Publication Award for Journal ArticlesUP System--
International Publication Award for Books/ Chapters of BooksUP System--
Outstanding R and D Award (Eduardo Quisumbing Medal for Basic Research, Julian Banzon Medal for Applied Research)NAST-DOSTNovember 30
Outstanding Science Administrator Award (Dioscoro Umali Award)NAST-DOSTNovember 30
Outstanding Technology Commercialization Award (Gregorio Zara Medal)NAST-DOSTNovember 30
Outstanding Young ScientistsNAST-DOSTNovember 30
TWAS Prize for Young Scientists in the PhilippinesNAST-DOSTNovember 30
NAST-Du Pont Talent Search for Young ScientistsNAST-DOSTNovember 30
Outstanding Scientific PaperNAST-DOSTNovember 30
Outstanding Book and/ or MonographNAST-DOSTNovember 30
Pro Scientia Transformatrix AwardNAST-DOSTNovember 30
NAST-Hugh Greenwood Environmental Science AwardNAST-DOSTNovember 30
NAST-LELEDFI Award for Outstanding Research in Tropical MedicineNAST-DOSTNovember 30
Magsaysay Young Engineers/ TechnologistsNAST-DOSTNovember 30

Databases and Services

The Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Extension currently maintains the following offline databases in support to the monitoring and evaluation of university productivity in research and extension: Plans are being made to make new online databases to serve its clientele. For information needs, kindly send a request to the OVCRE by email.

Downloadable Forms

Click on the links to view/ save the files to your computer:

OVCRE Databank Input Forms

Guidelines and Document Input Forms of the UPLB Basic Research Program

Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines

Intellectual Property Forms

Funding Agencies Formats and Guidelines

You may also visit the following links to funding agency websites below:

Other Downloadables

Online Resources

In this section, UPLB faculty and staff can find links to some of the most common sources of external RDE funds, both local and international. Aside from these, users can find lists of reputable journal and book publishers, a list of online libraries, databases, and search engines for open access journals. We are also making some of the presentations by resource persons invited by the OVCRE in some of its seminars and research output dissemination activities.

Open Access Journal Search Engines

Open access journals are scholarly journals that are available to the reader "without financial or other barrier other than access to the internet itself." Some are subsidized, and some require payment on behalf of the author.

Here are some of the common sites which list open access journals:

Philippine Journals Online
http://www.philjol.info
Philippine Journals Online is a database of journals published in Philippines, covering the full range of academic disciplines. The objective of PhilJOL is to give greater visibility to the participating journals, and to the research they convey.

UP Diliman Journals Online
http://journals.upd.edu.ph/
The University of the Philippines (UP) Diliman Journals Online is a free online service exclusively offered to UP Diliman journals. It aims to gather all the UP Diliman journals in a single repository and widen their dissemination and visibility online.

JournalSeek
http://journalseek.net
Largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 92673 titles.

Public Library of Science
http://www.plosjournals.org
A nonprofit organization committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature freely available online, without restrictions on use or further distribution, free from private or government control.

Scitation
http://scitation.aip.org
Re-launch of the Online Journal Publishing Service (OJPS), a leader in online sci-tech publishing and journal hosting since 1996.

Directory of Open Access Journals
http://www.doaj.org
Covers free, full text, quality controlled scientific and scholarly journals.There are now 2747 journals in the directory. Currently 829 journals are searchable at article level. As of today 139702 articles are included in the DOAJ service.

CiteSeer
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu
A scientific literature digital library and search engine that focuses primarily on the literature in computer and information science. CiteSeer was the first digital library and search engine to provide automated citation indexing and citation linking using the method of autonomous citation indexing.

Project Muse
http://muse.jhu.edu
Unique collaboration between libraries and publishers providing 100% full-text, affordable and user-friendly online access to over 300 high quality humanities, arts, and social sciences journals from 60 scholarly publishers.

Highwire Press
http://highwire.stanford.edu
Hosts the largest repository of high impact, peer-reviewed content, with 1053 journals and 4,344,778 full text articles from over 130 scholarly publishers. HighWire-hosted publishers have collectively made 1,698,186 articles free. Highwire produces 71 of the 200 most-frequently-cited journals.

Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com
Provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. From one place, you can search across many disciplines and sources: peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts and articles, from academic publishers, professional societies, preprint repositories, universities and other scholarly organizations.

Scirus
http://www.scirus.com
Most comprehensive science-specific search engine on the Internet. Driven by the latest search engine technology, Scirus searches over 415 million science-specific Web pages.

OpenJ-Gate
http://www.openj-gate.com
Electronic gateway to global journal literature in open access domain. Open J-Gate provides seamless access to millions of journal articles available online. Open J-Gate is also a database of journal literature, indexed from 3000+ open access journals, with links to full text at publisher sites.

AGORA - Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture
http://www.aginternetwork.org/en/index.php
Enables developing countries to gain access to an outstanding digital library collection in the fields of food, agriculture, environmental science and related social sciences.

IngentaConnect
http://www.ingentaconnect.com

Reference Databases

Below is a list of most-recommended sites which provides tools to researchers, authors and science professionals who want to find global experts, funding opportunities, and author citations. This section will be updated periodically.

ISIHighlyCited.com
http://isihighlycited.com
Expert gateway to the most highly influential scientists and scholars worldwide.
This freely accessible Web site gives research professionals working in a variety of occupations an invaluable tool to identify individuals, departments and laboratories that have made fundamental contributions to the advancement of science and technology in recent decades.

Community of Science
http://www.cos.com
Community of Science (COS) is the leading global resource for hard-to-find information critical to scientific research and other projects across all disciplines. We aggregate valuable information so you spend less precious time and money searching for the information you need, leaving you more time and money for your projects.

Thomson Scientific
http://scientific.thomson.com
Through a variety of multidisciplinary products, you can discover current and retrospective information from approximately 8,500 of the globe's leading, peer-reviewed journals. These publications represent about 1.3 million articles and 30-35 million citations a year.

Reputable Journal and Book Publishers

Locally-Published ISI-Indexed Journals

  • Asia Life Sciences
  • Philippine Agricultural Scientist
  • Philippine Entomologist
  • Philippine Journal of Crop Science
  • Philippine Journal of Science
  • Philippine Journal of Veterinary Medicine
  • Philippine Scientist

International Book and Journal Publishers

Blackwell
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com
The world's leading society publisher, partnering with 665 academic, medical, and professional societies. Blackwell publishes 850 journals and, to date, has over 6,000 books in print.

Elsevier
http://www.elsevier.com
As the world’s leading publisher of science and health information, serves more than 30 million scientists, students, and health and information professionals worldwide.

Garland Science Publishing
http://www.garlandscience.com
Has been publishing scientific textbooks of the highest quality for the best part of two decades. In that time, Garland Science has established itself as one of the leading textbook publishers in the fields of cell and molecular biology, immunology and protein science

Harcourt Trade Publishers
http://www.harcourtbooks.com
Formerly Harcourt Brace and Co.

Macmillan
http://www.macmillan.com
Operates in 5 different areas of publishing: education, academic publishing including reference; science, technological and medical; fiction and non-fiction book; and publishing services including distribution and production.

Random House
http://www.randomhouse.com
Random House, Inc. is the world's largest English-language general trade book publisher.

Routledge
http://www.routledge.com
Publishes over 1,000 new books each year and has a back list of over 7,000 titles in print, as well as a growing list of journals in many different subject areas.

Multimedia for Researchers

Here are some of the Internet's newest portal/ sites which faculty and researchers can use to promote their scientific work, collaborate with other scientists in a online multimedia-centered community, and thus enjoy their web experiences:

Scivee
http://www.scivee.tv

SciVee allows scientists to communicate their work as a multimedia presentation incorporated with the content of their published article. Other scientists can freely view uploaded presentations and engage in virtual discussions with the author and other viewers.

SciVee is operated in partnership with the Public Library of Science (PLoS), the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC).

Presentations

We are making available various presentation slides which have been presented in some of OVCRE's seminars and research dissemination activities:


12th Annual Convention: Regulatory Regime for Herbal Products
Co-sponsored by the Natural Products Society of the Philippines and the
UPLB Committee on Natural Products RDE

December 6 - 7, 2007

Local Government Academy Training Center

UP Los Baños

Keynote Speech

Plants as Prolific Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry Laboratories (1 MB)
Dr. William G. Padolina
Deputy Director for Operations and Support Services
International Rice Research Institute

Plenary Papers

Ensuring Quality and Fostering Innovation: Dual Challenges to the